The domain of the digital must belong to users, -invisible, without a name, a role, or any interest. Here, life has been curated to a single extension, a meaningful and meaningless imagery. Are people hidden by too many images? Do they become images?
Once virtualized, our skin becomes permeable and one day, it will detach itself
completely from the hyper body and vanish. We [individual intelligences] have our image,
like a wheel’s tire, stripped of its own form through its continued use. This, a practical
evasion of biometric facial recognition -as the spectacle is the realm of vision, and vision is
exteriority- is a dispossession of oneself. How dreary to be somebody! Shamefully elitist and ego driven. But telepresence is always something more than just the projection of the image. Am I the one to become nobody on the void of a digital screen? Or is my being entangled into my process? Hello, I’m nobody, who are you?
digital realm shape a city’s landscape? Does the process of algorithmically
compelling details feel enough to develop its topography? “Un_Destroyable” is
an abstract vision of a city, its processes of historical formation, through an
abstract representation of manipulation of terrain and the construction of
structures. Computational images do not exist without the notion of
computational color, and vice versa – so does the land exist without the notion
of spatial promise? Can the digital represent a timeline of events that help
shape a landscape? Does interference, inputs, and features that compel the
centers, villages, mountains, and population be translated into a complex
system by itself that is technology?
Credits:3D Animation and soundtrack by Nobody